It seems to be common knowledge that the campaign is in debt.
Regardless of the actual amount, it was a poorly run campaign. It illustrates that money is not power. Money is potential power. It becomes power through successful direction.
If your comment is that she did not personally spend the money and not her fault, my point is that she is the one who hired the team. If not, whoever is in charge of her hired the team. Or to put it another way, whoever hired her team would probably be in charge of our government. Any way we look at it seems to have been waste.
She did not spend a "billion dollars more". Her campaign spent a total of a billion dollars.
You may be right. I've tried to verify the numbers. The Wall Street Journal claims she raised $1.2 billion. https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/harris-campaign-democrats-financial-contributions-spend-62630eb9?reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
It seems to be common knowledge that the campaign is in debt.
Regardless of the actual amount, it was a poorly run campaign. It illustrates that money is not power. Money is potential power. It becomes power through successful direction.
If your comment is that she did not personally spend the money and not her fault, my point is that she is the one who hired the team. If not, whoever is in charge of her hired the team. Or to put it another way, whoever hired her team would probably be in charge of our government. Any way we look at it seems to have been waste.
Wouldn't you agree?